细胞描述:
1939年3-甲基胆蒽颅内注射诱导Gl261肿瘤,经C57BL/6小鼠体内培养,经同基因小鼠株连续移植维持,于1990年代中期建立体外生长细胞培养;文献中描述了携带TP53和KRAS突变的细胞。
细胞特性:
1) 来源:小鼠,胶质瘤
2) 形态:胶质细胞,成纤维细胞样,贴壁生长
3) 规格:1×106cells
4) 培养条件:DMEM+10%FBS+ 1%P/S (推荐货号AW-MC001)
空气,95%;二氧化碳,5%
37℃
细胞接收后的处理:
1) 收到细胞后,活细胞首先观察培养瓶是否完好,培养液是否漏液,培养基是否浑浊;冻存细胞是否干冰已挥发完,冻存管盖是否脱落,破碎,若有这类情况,请务必拍照记录,并于收货24h内与我们联系。
2) 细胞处理:
复苏的细胞:如果是T-25培养瓶活细胞,收到后请用75%的酒精对培养瓶表面进行消毒处理,然后转入培养箱中静置2~3h后再进行后续处理。
备注:运输用的培养基不宜再次用来培养细胞,请按照说明书新配置完全培养基来培养细胞。
冻存细胞:如果是干冰运输的冻存细胞,收到后请立即转入液氮存储或者短暂(24h)放置-80度冰箱保存,或者直接进行细胞复苏。
细胞复苏、传代及冻存流程参考:
1、 细胞复苏
1) 配制完全培养基:基础培养基+胎牛血清+双抗(特殊培养基特殊配置);
2) 细胞复苏:取5ml完全培养基于15ml离心管中,37℃水浴锅预热,从液氮管(或者-80度冰箱)中快速取出冻存的细胞,放入37℃水浴锅中,摇晃使快速化冻(1min左右),然后将化冻的细胞和预热的培养基,移入超净工作台中,化冻的细胞加入到含预热培养基的15ml离心管中,1000rpm离心5min;
3) 吸弃上清,得到细胞沉淀,用2ml完全培养基轻轻重悬细胞,加入到T25培养瓶中,做好标记,放入37℃,5%CO2饱和适度培养箱中培养(培养皿复苏效果更好);
4) 24h后,观察细胞贴壁情况(未贴壁的即为死细胞--针对贴壁细胞),吸弃旧培养基,加入新鲜的预热(室温或37℃)的完全培养基,继续培养。
2、 细胞传代
1) 待细胞生长到80%-90%汇合度时,吸弃旧的培养基,加入1ml无菌PBS润洗一次,以去除残余的培养基及血清(血清含有胰酶的抑制因子),然后加入1ml 0.25%胰酶,37℃培养箱中消化(1~2min左右,不同细胞消化时间不同),取出细胞,镜下观察细胞至细胞皱缩变圆;
2) 加入1ml完全培养基(含FBS)终止消化,轻轻拍打,使细胞脱落下来成单个细胞悬液,收集细胞于15ml无菌离心管中,1000rpm,离心5min;
3) 收集细胞沉淀,完全培养基重悬,一分为二(可根据细胞生长速度调整比例),分别加入到2个新的培养瓶中,做好标记,放入培养箱中培养。
3、细胞冻存
1) 按照细胞传代方法,在超净工作台内消化收集细胞沉淀,取少量细胞用于计数;
2) 用预冷的1ml冻存液(90%完全培养基+10%DMSO)或者无血清细胞冻存液重悬细胞,加入到1.2ml冻存管中,密度为1*106个/ml。
3) 放入程序冻存盒,-80℃过夜后,转入液氮长期保存。
参考文献 (3)
The blood–brain barrier is often altered in glioblastoma (GBM) creating a blood–brain–tumor barrier (BBTB) composed of pericytes. The BBTB affects chemotherapy efficacy. However, the expression signatures of BBTB-associated pericytes remain unclear. We aimed to identify BBTB-associated pericytes in single-cell RNA sequencing data of GBM using pericyte markers, a normal brain pericyte expression signature, and functional enrichment. We identified parathyroid hormone receptor-1 (PTH1R) as a potential marker of pericytes associated with BBTB function. These pericytes interact with other cells in GBM mainly through extracellular matrix–integrin signaling pathways. Compared with normal pericytes, pericytes in GBM exhibited upregulation of several ECM genes (including collagen IV and FN1 ), and high expression levels of these genes were associated with a poor prognosis. Cell line experiments showed that PTH1R knockdown in pericytes increased collagen IV and FN1 expression levels. In mice models, the expression levels of PTH1R, collagen IV, and FN1 were consistent with these trends. Evans Blue leakage and IgG detection in the brain tissue suggested a negative correlation between PTH1R expression levels and blood–brain barrier function. Further, a risk model based on differentially expressed genes in PTH1R + pericytes had predictive value for GBM, as validated using independent and in-house cohorts.
Objective Glioblastoma (GBM) has poor clinical prognosis due to limited treatment options. In addition, the current treatment regimens for GBM may only slightly prolong patient survival. The aim of this study was to assess the role of BMAL1 in the immune microenvironment and drug resistance of GBM. Methods GBM cell lines with stable BMAL1 knockdown or LDHA overexpression were constructed, and functionally characterized by the CCK8, EdU incorporation, and transwell assays. In vivo GBM model was established in C57BL/6J mice. Flow cytometry, ELISA, immunofluorescence, and RT-qPCR were performed to detect macrophage polarization. Lactate production, pathological changes, and the expression of glycolytic proteins were analyzed by HE staining, immunohistochemistry, biochemical assays, and Western blotting. Results BMAL1 silencing inhibited the malignant characteristics, lactate production, and expression of glycolytic proteins in GBM cells, and these changes were abrogated by overexpression of LDHA or exogenous lactate supplementation. Furthermore, BMAL1 knockdown induced M1 polarization of macrophages, and inhibited M2 polarization and angiogenesis in GBM cells in conditioned media. Overexpression of LDHA or presence of exogenous lactate inhibited BMAL1-induced M1 polarization and angiogenesis. Finally, BMAL1 silencing and bevacizumab synergistically inhibited glycolysis, angiogenesis and M2 polarization, and promoted M1 polarization in vivo, thereby suppressing GBM growth. Conclusion BMAL1 silencing can sensitize GBM cells to bevacizumab by promoting M1/M2 polarization through the LDHA/lactate axis.
Glioma, marked by a low mutational burden, low immunogenicity, high heterogeneity, and the challenges posed by the blood–brain barrier, continues to be a major hurdle in neuro‐oncology. Current research underscores the necessity for more effective medications and treatment strategies. In this study, we explored the role of Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) in glioma using both bioinformatics and experimental methods. The construction of our bioinformatics risk model identified ApoE as a protective factor linked to longer survival in glioma patients. Subsequently, we created an in situ tumorigenic mouse model and a subcutaneous tumorigenic mouse model with ApoE gene knockout to evaluate the functional impacts of ApoE deficiency in glioma. Our results demonstrated that ApoE deficiency accelerates the growth of glioma and encourages the invasive behaviour of tumour cells into normal brain tissue. Additionally, we detected a reduction in the immune surveillance of glioma in the context of ApoE deficiency. Furthermore, flow cytometry analysis indicated that the lack of ApoE led to a decrease in positive immune cells and an increase in immunosuppressive cells within the tumour microenvironment. Our findings suggest that ApoE plays a crucial role in modulating glioma progression and immune surveillance, highlighting its potential as a therapeutic target.















